cloud storage service [technical] comparison

this article covers uncommon details.

It do not covers: speed, storage, price, etc.

I do covers: limit, bugs, something most users do not care about.

dropbox

  • ONLY service which fully support symlink.
  • summrize recent sync list.
  • easy start/resume sync.
  • sync folder is movable without reinstalling application. (may only?)

google drive

  • selective sync is limited to 1-depth; you can select immediate children of root only.
  • requires redaudant space: If you are using selective sync and have enough space to some of item but not all, You will receive “no enough space” message and your sync will be paused. No workaround; You have to clear out your local disk or cloud either.
  • have some installation issues. (python library is not loaded; I encounted this when I installed it on windows server, and resolved it by installing “desktop experinces”.)

onedrive

  • some bugs with selective sync. If you select some but not all of the item, then you will find all of them are loaded. a workaround is re-configure it. 2nd try after “complete” sync will resolve this problem.
  • inconvenient to start/resume sync; It may be critical if you are having modification detection issue or when you are in a hurry.
  • symlink is not supported; Altough both windows and ondrive are product of same company(Micro$oft).

using gImageX in windows PE – install windows without booting disk in 1 partition environment

short version:

boot to windows PE(Windows Preinstallation Environment) and run gimagex.

if you have no boot disk but running windows, that’s OK: run “ReAgentc.exe /boottore” (need administrator privilege) then reboot.

you will boot to windows RE(Windows Recovery Environment; it is a special kind of win PE). open console, then run gimagex. it will be executed with no problems.

*** don’t forget to enter bcdboot.exe C:\windows to create bootloader entry. ***


long version:

I prefer multiple partitions for system disk. It have some advantages over 1 partition structure: you don’t need a backup, you “may” expect longer disk life(in case of SSD, because it allows you to write disk side to side.)

But I had to use 1 partition in my laptop, because of its limited space. And recently… I need re-install.

Well, re-install using wim(windwos imaging file) is quite simple: if you have multiple partitions. just boot in windows, run gimagex, apply to new partition. and make boot item to boot manager. done!

And here is the challeange: you have no enough space for another partition.

A standard way to install windows using existing wim, is creating windows installtion disk using windows AIK(or ADK, brand new name for win 8+). but I don’t want to do that for single installation.

After few hours of searching, I found intresting information: ImageX can be used in windows PE installation. Accoring to this(https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd744320%28v=ws.10%29.aspx), In order to capture windows you must boot to windows PE, (or, you can use another windows installation. windows PE is just an “lightweight” installation) then run imagex. So it means you can use imageX in windows PE! okay, then how about gImageX?

The answer is, YES. In windows PE you can run not only command line program but also (some) win32 applications. and gimagex is one of them. so use it like in regular windows.


2017-03-15 17:12 update:

revise some sentences for easy reading.

same day, 20:15 update:

add bcdboot.exe notice

enabling z77 extreme4 wol

ASROCK Z77 EXTREME4 has onboard lan, but it seems to be an PCI-E device.

So In its bios menu there is no “Wake on lan enable” or somewhat.

To enable WOL, you should enable “PCI devices power on”. It’s loacted in ACPI configuration.

ACPI configuration page. Image from ASROCK manual.
ACPI configuration page. Image from ASROCK manual.

You should setup your lan driver, if needed.

Intel i3-4150 구입기

그리고 12시간 뒤면 반품기가 될 예정…

짧은 버전

인텔 느그 5년 동안 뭐했노! 부끄러운 줄 알아야지!

…는 사실 최근에는 성능보다는 절전에만 치중하는 것 같지만

——————————————————————————————————————-

긴 버전

지금까지 쓰던 프로세서는 i5-760 입니다. 인텔의 i시리즈 1세대 프로세서죠.

원래는 i3가 보급형, i5가 메인스트림, i7이 하드코어라는 포지션이었지만 요즘은 셀러론에 펜티엄도 부활해서 셀러론이 저가형, 펜티엄이 메인스트림, i 시리즈는 고급형이 된 느낌입니다.

760은 HT로 뻥튀기한 가짜가 아닌 진짜 쿼드코어로서 제가 최초로 예산을 제한하지 않고 고른 CPU이기도 합니다. 사실 쿼드코어 CPU에 동경하고 있었기 떄문에 샀습니다만. 실은 사면서도 쿼드코어는 성능과 예산의 낭비가 아닌가 하는 생각은 있었습니다. 확실히 CPU 성능이 모자라서 답답한 적은 없었습니다… 랄까 사실 이 부분은 업그레이드 하기 전에는 모르는 부분이지만.

아무튼 이번에 산 i3-4150은 i시리즈 4세대로서 760보다는 4년 뒤에 나온 모델입니다. 이 정도면 원래는 산이 없어지고 강이 생기는 시절인데… 아무리 듀얼코어라지만 760보다 성능이 많이 떨어지는군요.

벤치마크 점수에서는 단일 코어, 패키지 모두 760보다 낫기에 믿고 사봤는데, 실제 작업에서는 760으로는 원할하던 작업이 4150으로는 과부하가 걸리더군요. HT를 제대로 지원하지 못해서 그런건가… 예를 들면 SVP(Smooth Video Project). 760은 Profile #3로도 원활히 재생되었는데 4150은 #2 로도 프레임 스킵이 발생하는 문제가 있었습니다.

벤치값은 760이 3925, 4150이 4937로 ( 참조: http://www.cpubenchmark.net/compare.php?cmp%5B%5D=773&cmp%5B%5D=2252 ) 4150이 더 높은데 부들부들… 역시 벤치값만이 성능의 전부가 아니군요.

4세대 (하스웰) 프로세서가 전력면에서는 엄청나게 개선되었다고는 하지만 (데이터시트에 의하면 거의 절반 수준) 성능면에서는 5년 동안 거의 발전한게 없는 것 같습니다.